What could go wrong? A lot, unfortunately. Firstly, Atatat digital photo frames don’t offer cloud storage. Instead, you get internal storage and USB/SD card support. Like some top digital frames such as the Pix-Star, Atatat frames let you play slideshows directly off connected USB/SD cards – but it’s very slow. Oftentimes, only a handful of photos will cycle, with most remaining photos never displaying. Atatat’s digital photo frames can only play 15-second video clips and cannot play them alongside photos. There’s no internal file explorer for selecting which files and folders to include in slideshows. You don’t have much – if any – control over the play order of slideshows or the frequency at which photos show up. Additionally, there are no advanced features like remote configuration and photo imports from social media. These are features that Pix-Star’s digital frames do best – without costing much more than the Atatat digital photo frame. Another common complaint about Atatat’s digital photo frames is their poor build quality. It’s part of the reason why they can afford to offer a lower price for a similar display resolution and relatively robust feature set. ![]() When you break it down and compare the features with what Pix-Star offer, you quickly realize that Atatat’s frames don’t offer great value for money – despite their lower price point. ![]() Build quality and image quality both drastically misses the mark. Photos often don’t display if they are larger than a specific size (almost all smartphones take quite large photos) which negates much of the mobile app’s purpose. We recommend going with an established digital photo frame brand like the Pix-Star.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |